Murder in Antarctica
Today in discussion at philosophy club:
Is it murder to shoot someone in Antarctica?
Group consensus:
It’s not a crime, but you are still a terrible person.
Thought Itself
The History of Thought with Eric Gerlach
- Courses
- Thought
- Ethics
- Logic
- Politics
- Egypt
- Middle East
- India
- Greece
- China
- Europe
- America
- Itsy
- Me
- Courses
- Thought
- Ethics
- Logic
- Politics
- Egypt
- Middle East
- India
- Greece
- China
- Europe
- America
- Itsy
- Me
-
Recent Posts
- Mayan Funeral Guy Says Stop What You’re Doing, Possibly About To Mayan Ruin
- Egyptian Bowl With Feet, 3650 BCE, Almost 6 Thousand Years Ago
- Greek Buddhist Bodhisattva Head
- Alice, Aristotle’s Syllogisms & Boole’s AND, OR & NOT
- Tiffany Versus Kierkegaard: I Think We’re Horribly Free Now
- South Korea Is Totally Lit
- Is a catnap literal or metaphorical?
- Poe, Detective Stories & Emotional Analysis
- Kittens Wrestle Nietzsche Recurrently, Possibly Eternally, Certainly Existentially
- Billy Joel Versus Aristotle On Identity
- Leibniz & The Principle Of Non-Contradiction
- Fireside Cats
- Logic & The Golden Age Of Islamic Philosophy
- Ruining The Joke: My Math Teacher Is Plotting Something
- Roberto Matta – Chilean Surrealist
No, maybe he does not die. You should just give him more 3 shots to make sure. So, murder!
We were assuming he would die when you shoot him, and there was no discussion over the number of shots it would take. I’m not sure why you think three shots, but not one, would constitute murder.