Murder in Antarctica
Today in discussion at philosophy club:
Is it murder to shoot someone in Antarctica?
Group consensus:
It’s not a crime, but you are still a terrible person.
Thought Itself
The History of Thought with Eric Gerlach
- Courses
- Thought
- Ethics
- Logic
- Politics
- Egypt
- Middle East
- India
- Greece
- China
- Europe
- America
- Itsy
- Me
- Courses
- Thought
- Ethics
- Logic
- Politics
- Egypt
- Middle East
- India
- Greece
- China
- Europe
- America
- Itsy
- Me
-
Recent Posts
- Are & Aren’tgentina
- Aristotle on Chartres Cathedral
- Kitten Cuddle Party with Tiger & Snowball
- Death Mask of Nietzsche
- Tiny Tiger Is Suspicious
- Snowball the Kitten Reclines with the Buddha
- Sesame Street’s Waiting For Elmo
- Scream & Surprise Face
- Polite Whale Party
- Squad Goals & Himalayan Goats
- Turtle Chomps Watermelon
- Heroin Spoon Sculpture Left Outside Pharma Co
- Buddha with Halo
- Wittgenstein says a train station on Mars is completely meaningless.
- San Francisco after the 1906 Earthquake
No, maybe he does not die. You should just give him more 3 shots to make sure. So, murder!
We were assuming he would die when you shoot him, and there was no discussion over the number of shots it would take. I’m not sure why you think three shots, but not one, would constitute murder.