Social & Political Philosophy
PHIL 2, Spring 2017, Class Code: 21172
Mon/Wed 9 – 10:15 AM, Room: BCC 52
Instructor: Eric Gerlach – email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Office Hours: Fridays 12 – 1:30 PM @ K’s Coffee, next to BCC
Course Description: This course introduces students to the history of Social and Political Philosophy. We will study ancient and modern thinkers on the subjects of human nature, social class, authority, liberty, capitalism, socialism, communism, anarchism, fascism, post-colonialism, and feminism.
Texts: The readings for each lecture will be posted in the lecture notes or distributed via email list a week before we cover each topic.
Assignments: Two 3-5 page essays (50%) & a final 6-10 page paper (50%)
Jan 23 – Introduction
Jan 25 & 30 – Tribal & City State Politics
Feb 1 & 6 – The Analects of Confucius
Feb 8 & 13 – Plato’s Republic
Feb 15 & 22 – Aristotle’s Politics – 1st Paper Assigned Feb 22
Feb 27 & Mar 1 – Machiavelli’s The Prince – 1st Paper Due Mar 1
Mar 6 & 8 – Hobbes’ Leviathan
Mar 13 & 15 – Locke’s Second Treatise of Government
Mar 20 & 22 – Rousseau’s Discourse on Inequality – 2nd Paper Assigned Mar 22
Mar 27 & 29 – Mill’s On Liberty
Apr 3 & 5 – Thoreau’s On the Duty of Civil Disobedience – 2nd Paper Due Apr 5
Apr 10 & 12 – No Class – Spring Break
Apr 17 & 19 – Engel’s Socialism: Utopian & Scientific
Apr 24 & 26 – Marx & Engel’s Communist Manifesto – Final Paper Assigned Apr 26
May 1 & 3 – Marcuse’s Reason & Revolution
May 8 & 9 – Bakunin’s God & the State
May 15 & 17 – Wollstonecraft’s Vindication of the Rights of Woman
May 22 & 24 – Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth – Final Paper Due May 28
For each of your response essays, write an argument of the required length, typed and double spaced with standard fonts and margins, focused on a single idea or issue, clearly stating your position at the beginning and then using evidence and reasoning to support your position.
You are welcome to use your own life experience, current events, historical examples, or examples from fiction to support your argument.
You are welcome to use your own life experience, current events, historical examples, or examples from fiction. You can also cite material we study or from outside the class by stating the Title of the Work in Italics, and the authors name. You do not need to include a bibliography.
Please attach your essay to an email and send it to email@example.com by the due date on the syllabus. I prefer email attachments, but I will also accept printed copies by hand or in my box at BCC.
1st Response Essay Topics
1) The two major Confucians after Confucius, Mencius and Xunzi, agree that Confucius’ teachings are wise and that we should cultivate ourselves through education and participating in society. However, they completely disagree on whether human nature is good or evil. Mencius argues that human nature is good, and education expands what we originally are. Xunzi argues that human nature is evil, and society is necessary to change us from what we originally are. Who do you find yourself agreeing with more, and why?
2) Mozi argues for universal love versus the Confucians such as Mencius who argue that love is naturally varied depending on familiarity. Are the two positions compatible? Is one more favorable than the other?
3) Plato and Aristotle both argue that we should have a meritocracy and elevate those who are more skilled and intelligent into a ruling class. Given that we want leaders and expert opinions but also must avoid abuses of power, how should authority and expertise be utilized such that it does not become abusive?
2nd Response Essay Topics
1)Machiavelli argues that holding power requires the use of deception and violence. Is this necessarily true, and what does it tell us about how we do or should deal with power and violence? Is violence justified or necessary to maintain power, and if so, is this inevitable?
2) Hobbes argues that the sovereign must be given unchecked power through the social contract to prevent partisan conflict, while Locke argues that there must be checks against the power of the sovereign to prevent violation of the social contract. Does unchecked power have a proper place in our lives, either for those in positions of power or for the common individual?
3) Hobbes argues that in the state of nature, before the social contract, life is nasty, brutish and short, while Rousseau argues that in the state of nature we were noble savages. What do human cultures teach us about violence, safety and civilization, and what does this mean for modern society?
4) The American and French revolutions show us similar examples of abuse of power followed by response to that abuse of power. Given the theories of one or more of the thinkers we have covered so far, what do these examples tell us about how power works and whether or not it changes over time.
3rd Response Essay Topics
Bentham vs Mill on Utilitarianism
Locke vs Thoreau on Property
Capitalism vs Socialism on unplanned & planned economies
Socialism/Communism’s top-down vs Anarchism’s bottom-up organization
Cultural unity vs multicultural plurality
The advantages & disadvantages of violent & nonviolent resistance & revolution
Essay Grading Policy: For each essay, state the question you are answering and take a clear position at the beginning, then argue with clear and focused points for the required page length. Do not summarize material that is irrelevant. You can include personal experience, examples from fiction or material from outside the course.
This class is acceptable for credit at UC and CSU. It counts towards GE AA/AS area 3; CSU area C2; and IGETC area 3. It can be used as an elective for the Liberal Arts with an Emphasis in Arts and Humanities, Associate in Arts Degree Program and the Liberal Arts: Intersegmental General Education Transfer (IGETC) Certificate of Achievement and the Global Studies AA Degree.
Student Learning Outcomes
1. Demonstrate an understanding of the concepts of major philosophers.
2. Analyze and evaluate philosophical positions through argument that displays individual perspective.
General Student Requirements: Students are expected to come to class prepared to ask questions and participate in discussions. All readings and assignments should be completed by the beginning of class on the day they are listed here. This class is run as a lecture/discussion course. Students are responsible for all class material (even if they miss class). If you miss class, it is strongly advised that you ask a classmate for notes. It is your responsibility to ask if you missed something; it is not the instructor’s responsibility to remind you. Please read through the syllabus and plan ahead.
Plagiarism, “to use another person’s ideas or expressions in your writing without acknowledging the source” (MLA Handbook, 5th ed., §1.8)—will not be tolerated. Plagiarists, intentional or inadvertent, will receive a zero on the assignment in question; repeat offenders will get an F for the course and will be subject to college disciplinary action. Students are encouraged to review plagiarism policies in the current catalog.
Disabled Student Program and Services (DSPS) are provided for any enrolled student who has a verified disability that creates an educational limitation that prevents the student from fully benefiting from classes without additional support services or instruction. Please let the instructor know if you require any support services or would like more information about DSPS.
This syllabus is subject to change at the discretion of the instructor. Any changes will be announced in class. Additional handouts of required readings may also be added.